The nature vs nurture debate is the scientific, cultural, and philosophical debate about whether human culture, behavior, and personality are caused primarily by nature or nurture nature is often defined in this debate as genetic or hormone-based behaviors, while nurture is most commonly defined as environment and experience. While admittedly an oversimplification, one useful way to track progress in the nature-nurture debate is to divide the evolution of our understanding into three main states part 1: nature versus.
Nature vs nurture pages: 23-28 77-81 402-406 514-518 study play nature-nurture debate argument of what determines our personality and behavior: innate biology or life experience nature-only view who we are comes from inborn tendencies and genetically based traits nature and nurture shape personality. Nurture is generally taken as the influence of external factors after conception, eg, the product of exposure, experience and learning on an individual the nature-nurture debate is concerned with the relative contribution that both influences make to human behavior. The nature-nurture controversy is an age-old dispute among behavioral psychologists, philosophers, theologians, and theorists of consciousness as to the source of the creation ofhuman personality: does it develop primarily from biology (nature), or from the environments in which we are raised (nurture) people have been pondering the role of nature and environmentsince the time of hippocrates (c 460-c 377 bc. The nature versus nurture debate is about the relative influence of an individual's innate attributes as opposed to the experiences from the environment one is brought up in, in determining individual differences in physical and behavioral traits. In the context of the nature vs nurture debate, “nature” refers to biological/genetic predispositions’ impact on human traits, and nurture describes the influence of learning and other influences from one’s environment.
Contemporary views of nature vs nurture throughout the history of psychology , however, this debate has continued to stir up controversy eugenics, for example, was a movement heavily influenced by the nativist approach.
Part 1: nature versus nurture the origins of nature versus nurture debate date back for thousands of years and across many cultures the greek philosopher galen theorized that personality traits were the result of a person’s relative concentrations of four bodily fluids, or humours, namely blood, phlegm, yellow bile, and black bile. Colloquial term for the two views of human development, one emphasizing heredity and the other environment the nature-nurture controversy is an age-old dispute among behavioral psychologists, philosophers, theologians, and theorists of consciousness as to the source of the creation ofhuman personality: does it develop primarily from biology (nature), or from the environments in which we are.
The nature vs nurture debate goes on and on, but still, it is a fact that we have traits that are predetermined by our genes, but we can still choose who we want to be as we travel through our lifetime. In the past, debates over the relative contributions of nature versus nurture often took a very one-sided approach, with one side arguing that nature played the most important role and the other side suggesting that it was nurture that was the most significant.